Ray v. Natick Cab., Co.
42 Mass. App. Dec. 6
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division·Decided March 19, 1969·No. No. 6997; No. 2837·Published
Opinion
This appeal is from a ruling of an interlocutory matter in a case not ripe for judgment.
The report does not clearly appear to be the report of the trial judge.
The case is remanded without prejudice to the Third District Court of Eastern Middlesex for a trial on the merits. Patrick v. Mikolaitis, 22 Mass. App. Dec. 167. Pokrant v. Horrigan, 20 Mass. App. Dec. 1. Krock v. Consolidated Mines and Power Co., 286 Mass. 177.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ray v. Natick Cab., Co., 42 Mass. App. Dec. 6 (Mass. Ct. App. 1969).
42 Mass. App. Dec. 6 (Ray v. Natick Cab., Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Krock v. Consolidated Mines & Power Co.
189 N.E. 822 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Patrick v. Mikolaitis
22 Mass. App. Dec. 167 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1961)
Pokrant v. Horrigan
20 Mass. App. Dec. 1 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1960)