Ray v. Natick Cab., Co.

Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.

Ray v. Natick Cab., Co.

42 Mass. App. Dec. 6

CourtMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

DecidedMarch 19, 1969

DocketNo. 6997; No. 2837

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Mass. App. Dec. 6 (Ray v. Natick Cab., Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray v. Natick Cab., Co., 42 Mass. App. Dec. 6 (Mass. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This appeal is from a ruling of an interlocutory matter in a case not ripe for judgment.

Franklin C. Bronson for Plaintiff. Joseph Stashio for Defendant.

The report does not clearly appear to be the report of the trial judge.

The case is remanded without prejudice to the Third District Court of Eastern Middlesex for a trial on the merits. Patrick v. Mikolaitis, 22 Mass. App. Dec. 167. Pokrant v. Horrigan, 20 Mass. App. Dec. 1. Krock v. Consolidated Mines and Power Co., 286 Mass. 177.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI