Ray v. Morgan

38 S.E. 335, 112 Ga. 923, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 131
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 1, 1901·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. The unconditional acceptance of a draft by the drawee thereof renders him liable to the payee, whether the former at the time of accepting the paper did or did not have in his hands funds of the drawer. Applying this rule to the evidence in the present case, the plaintiff showed a prima facie right to recover, and accordingly there was no error in refusing to grant a nonsuit.

2. As there was no motion for a new trial and it plainly appears that none of the charges excepted to necessarily controlled the verdict against the plaintiff in error, these charges, even if for any reason inapplicable or erroneous, afford no cause for reversing the judgment of the court below. See Smith v. Smith, 112 Ga. 351; Ocean Steamship Co. v. Hamilton, Id. 901.

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring, except Simmons, G. J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Morgan, 38 S.E. 335, 112 Ga. 923, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 131 (Ga. 1901).

38 S.E. 335 (Ray v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hovsepian v. Brown
100 S.E.2d 603 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Nail v. Nail
60 S.E.2d 749 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Federal Land Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
2 S.E.2d 916 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
McRae v. Boykin
179 S.E. 535 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Blackman
68 S.E. 339 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Henderson v. State
51 S.E. 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)