Ray v. Mills

366 S.W.3d 84, 2012 WL 1623566, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 618
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 2012·No. ED 96921·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Theoda E. Mills (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a trial de novo awarding Darryl Robert Ray damages in the amount of $1,639.53 ($1,387.53 in medical and $258 in property) against Appellant and denying Appellant’s counterclaim. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and did not erroneously declare or misapply the law. 6226 Northwood Condominium Ass’n v. Dwyer, 330 S.W.3d 504, 505 (Mo.App. E.D.2010). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Mills, 366 S.W.3d 84, 2012 WL 1623566, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 618 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

366 S.W.3d 84 (Ray v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

6226 NORTHWOOD CONDOMINIUM ASS'N v. Dwyer
330 S.W.3d 504 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)