Ray v. Maxwell
This text of 403 S.E.2d 442 (Ray v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants, pro se, filed this direct appeal after they were found in contempt of court for violating a permanent restraining order.
Their notice of appeal states in its entirety: “Fred T. Ray and Carrie S. Ray come now and file this Notice of Appeal to the Georgia Court of Appeals. Transcript and brief will be provided.” As this notice of appeal fails to specify any judgment whatever, it does not satisfy the requirements of OCGA § 5-6-37, and OCGA § 5-6-48 (f) does not apply. Therefore, the appeal must be dismissed. Ballew v. State, 225 Ga. 547, 548 (170 SE2d 242); Whiddon v. Stargell, 192 Ga. App. 826, 828 (386 SE2d 884).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
403 S.E.2d 442, 198 Ga. App. 849, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-maxwell-gactapp-1991.