Ray v. Hill Veneer Co.

119 S.E. 925, 186 N.C. 773, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 349
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 7, 1923
StatusPublished

This text of 119 S.E. 925 (Ray v. Hill Veneer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray v. Hill Veneer Co., 119 S.E. 925, 186 N.C. 773, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 349 (N.C. 1923).

Opinion

Pee OueiaM.

Without stating the facts, some of which are in dispute, we are convinced, from a careful perusal of the record, viewing *774 the evidence in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, the accepted position on a motion -to nonsuit, that the case should have been submitted to the jury. No benefit would be derived from detailing the evidence, some of which is denied by the defendant, as the only question before us is whether or not it is sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and we think it is.

The judgment of nonsuit will be set aside and the case remanded for another trial.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 S.E. 925, 186 N.C. 773, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-hill-veneer-co-nc-1923.