Ray v. Haines

52 Ill. 485
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

In this case a minor had contracted to work for the defendant nine months, but left after working six weeks. Being a minor, his contract was not obligatory upon him,- and he was entitled to recover from his employer the value of the services rendered. This value the court inferred from the amount admitted by the defendant to have been due the plaintiff when he left, as wages, and we are not inclined to reverse because the proof was not more positive.

Judgment affirmed. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Haines, 52 Ill. 485 (Ill. 1869).

52 Ill. 485 (Ray v. Haines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cain v. Garner
185 S.W. 122 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1916)
Myers v. Rehkopf
30 Ill. App. 209 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)
Danville v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.
62 N.H. 133 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1882)