Ray v. Gunn
This text of 7 S.E.2d 686 (Ray v. Gunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Property in the possession of a levying officer in pursuance of a lawful process can not be recovered from the officer in an action of trover. In such a case the property is in custodia legis, and there has been no conversion thereof. Phillips v. Evans, 45 Ga. App. 440 (165 S. E. 140); Martin v. English, 23 Ga. App. 484 (98 S. E. 505); Jeems v. Lewis, 13 Ga. App. 456 (2, 3) (79 S. E. 235) ; Barton v. Thompson, 13 Ga. App. 786 (80 S. E. 30) ; Jones v. McCowen, 34 Ga. App. 801 (2) (131 S. E. 290).
2. Applying the foregoing ruling to the facts of the instant case, the court did not err in dismissing the action on the ground “that trover is not the remedy to obtain personal property from a levying officer.”
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 S.E.2d 686, 61 Ga. App. 805, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-gunn-gactapp-1940.