Ray v. Gunn

7 S.E.2d 686, 61 Ga. App. 805, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 274
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 1, 1940·No. 28017.·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Property in the possession of a levying officer in pursuance of a lawful process can not be recovered from the officer in an action of trover. In such a case the property is in custodia legis, and there has been no conversion thereof. Phillips v. Evans, 45 Ga. App. 440 (165 S. E. 140); Martin v. English, 23 Ga. App. 484 (98 S. E. 505); Jeems v. Lewis, 13 Ga. App. 456 (2, 3) (79 S. E. 235) ; Barton v. Thompson, 13 Ga. App. 786 (80 S. E. 30) ; Jones v. McCowen, 34 Ga. App. 801 (2) (131 S. E. 290).

2. Applying the foregoing ruling to the facts of the instant case, the court did not err in dismissing the action on the ground “that trover is not the remedy to obtain personal property from a levying officer.”

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Gunn, 7 S.E.2d 686, 61 Ga. App. 805, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

7 S.E.2d 686 (Ray v. Gunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeems v. Lewis
79 S.E. 235 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Barton v. Thompson
80 S.E. 30 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Martin v. English
98 S.E. 505 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Jones v. McCowen
131 S.E. 290 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Phillips v. Evans
165 S.E. 140 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)