Ray v. Dudley-Allen

129 Misc. 2d 1011, 499 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1985 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3103
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 13, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered June 10, 1985 reversed, with $10 costs, tenant’s and undertenant Marie Vanderwaeren’s cross motions to dismiss the petition are denied, the petition is reinstated, and petitioner’s motion for leave to conduct disclosure is granted, for the reasons stated in Madison Co. v Derderian (130 Misc 2d 200 [App Term, 1st Dept]).

Hughes, P. J., Riccobono and Parness, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Dudley-Allen, 129 Misc. 2d 1011, 499 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1985 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

129 Misc. 2d 1011 (Ray v. Dudley-Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thames Realty Co. v. Grant
128 A.D.2d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)