Ray v. City of Raleigh Fire Department

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Ray v. City of Raleigh Fire Department

130 S.E.2d 401, 259 N.C. 291, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 544

DecidedApril 17, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E.2d 401 (Ray v. City of Raleigh Fire Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray v. City of Raleigh Fire Department, 130 S.E.2d 401, 259 N.C. 291, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 544 (N.C. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s assignment of error does not present the legal question discussed in defendant’s brief. Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N.C. 537, 35 S.E. 2d 609; Glace v. Throwing Co., 239 N.C. 668, 80 S.E. 2d 759. Even so, it seems appropriate to say that, according to un-contradicted evidence, plaintiff was entitled to the award. The evidence indicates the award involves a doctor’s bill of one hundred dollars and ■a hospital bill of one hundred dollars.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s assignment of error does not present the legal question discussed in defendant’s brief. Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N.C. 537, 35 S.E. 2d 609; Glace v. Throwing Co., 239 N.C. 668, 80 S.E. 2d 759. Even so, it seems appropriate to say that, according to un-contradicted evidence, plaintiff was entitled to the award. The evidence indicates the award involves a doctor’s bill of one hundred dollars and ■a hospital bill of one hundred dollars.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 S.E.2d 401, 259 N.C. 291, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-city-of-raleigh-fire-department-nc-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack