Ray v. Bush

1 Root 81
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1783
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Root 81 (Ray v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray v. Bush, 1 Root 81 (Colo. Ct. App. 1783).

Opinion

By the Court

The evidence is admissible.

The defendant then offered tbe deposition of Titus ITosmer, Esq. who was deceased, given upon a petition to tbe general assembly, between tbe same parties, and relative to tbe same point now in dispute — which was objected against, on tbe ground tbat it was taken before this action was commenced, and on) a petition in chancery.

By the Court. Tbe deposition was admitted; and upon tbe evidence tbe aforesaid state of facts Avas proved. And verdict and judgment was for tbe defendant, upon the ground, tbat although tbe statute says, tbat a deed, when recorded at length, tbe record shall bear tbe same date as tbe entry made upon it when it was received for record; yet where a grantee will himself, by orders or otherways, prevent tbe deed’s being recorded at length, tbe relation between tbe entry and tbe recording at length, is destroyed, as to all persons defrauded thereby, and the record bears date at tbe time when tbe deed is recorded at length.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orr v. Hadley
36 N.H. 575 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1858)
Hall v. Leonard
18 Mass. 27 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1822)
French v. Gray
2 Conn. 92 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1816)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-bush-connsuperct-1783.