Ray v. Ayers

The Superior Court of New York City

Ray v. Ayers

5 Duer 494

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedApril 15, 1856

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Duer 494 (Ray v. Ayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray v. Ayers, 5 Duer 494 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court. Slosson, J.

The order at Special Term, overruling the demurrer, must be affirmed, with costs.

It has long been settled law that the reversioner may maintain an action on the case, for an injury to the freehold, committed by the tenant, and that the action may be brought before the expiration of the term. (14 East. 489.)

[495]*495The count, or subdivision, demurred to, is inartiflcially drawn, but, taken in connection with other averments in the complaint, contains, in substance, a good cause of action.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court. Slosson, J.

The order at Special Term, overruling the demurrer, must be affirmed, with costs.

It has long been settled law that the reversioner may maintain an action on the case, for an injury to the freehold, committed by the tenant, and that the action may be brought before the expiration of the term. (14 East. 489.)

[495]*495The count, or subdivision, demurred to, is inartiflcially drawn, but, taken in connection with other averments in the complaint, contains, in substance, a good cause of action.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Duer 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-ayers-nysuperctnyc-1856.