Ray v. Ashburn Bank

89 S.E.2d 889, 212 Ga. 37
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 13, 1955·No. 19110·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Where, as here, stipulated facts show that the defendant in fi. fa. conveyed the land levied upon to a claimant for a valuable consideration, the deed containing a clause to the effect that the grantor reserved the right to occupy the conveyed land without paying rent “so long as he desires to do so,” the reservation is not a life estate, since by its plain terms it may be terminated at will; and it was therefore not subject to the levy, and the court erred in ruling against the claimant. Code § 61-101; Harber & Brother v. Nash, 126 Ga. 777 (55 S. E. 928). Compare Mitchell v. Spillers, 203 Ga. 565 (47 S. E. 2d 564).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Ashburn Bank, 89 S.E.2d 889, 212 Ga. 37 (Ga. 1955).

89 S.E.2d 889 (Ray v. Ashburn Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Day v. Tribble
210 S.E.2d 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)