Ray v. Ashburn Bank
This text of 89 S.E.2d 889 (Ray v. Ashburn Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where, as here, stipulated facts show that the defendant in fi. fa. conveyed the land levied upon to a claimant for a valuable consideration, the deed containing a clause to the effect that the grantor reserved the right to occupy the conveyed land without paying rent “so long as he desires to do so,” the reservation is not a life estate, since by its plain terms it may be terminated at will; and it was therefore not subject to the levy, and the court erred in ruling against the claimant. Code § 61-101; Harber & Brother v. Nash, 126 Ga. 777 (55 S. E. 928). Compare Mitchell v. Spillers, 203 Ga. 565 (47 S. E. 2d 564).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E.2d 889, 212 Ga. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-ashburn-bank-ga-1955.