Ray v. Ashburn Bank

89 S.E.2d 889, 212 Ga. 37
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 13, 1955
Docket19110
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 S.E.2d 889 (Ray v. Ashburn Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray v. Ashburn Bank, 89 S.E.2d 889, 212 Ga. 37 (Ga. 1955).

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Where, as here, stipulated facts show that the defendant in fi. fa. conveyed the land levied upon to a claimant for a valuable consideration, the deed containing a clause to the effect that the grantor reserved the right to occupy the conveyed land without paying rent “so long as he desires to do so,” the reservation is not a life estate, since by its plain terms it may be terminated at will; and it was therefore not subject to the levy, and the court erred in ruling against the claimant. Code § 61-101; Harber & Brother v. Nash, 126 Ga. 777 (55 S. E. 928). Compare Mitchell v. Spillers, 203 Ga. 565 (47 S. E. 2d 564).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Day v. Tribble
210 S.E.2d 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E.2d 889, 212 Ga. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-ashburn-bank-ga-1955.