Ray Riojas v. Water Meadow, Inc.
This text of Ray Riojas v. Water Meadow, Inc. (Ray Riojas v. Water Meadow, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00465-CV
Ray RIOJAS, Appellant
v.
WATER MEADOW, INC., Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024CV04735 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 30, 2024
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
Appellant Ray Riojas appeals the trial court’s final judgment signed June 28, 2024.
Appellant’s brief was originally due September 16, 2024, but neither the brief nor a motion for
extension of time was filed. On September 23, 2024, we ordered appellant to file, not later than
October 10, 2024, his appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to
timely file the brief. We advised appellant that if he failed to file a brief and the written response
by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3 (court may dismiss appeal for want of prosecution or because 04-24-00465-CV
appellant has failed to comply with a court order within the time provided). Appellant has not filed
a brief or the written response ordered by the court.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ray Riojas v. Water Meadow, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-riojas-v-water-meadow-inc-texapp-2024.