Ray Richardson, Inc. v. Carlton

191 So. 433, 140 Fla. 229, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1093
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 10, 1939·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

This appeal is from a final decree refusing specific performance of a written contract to convey lands in Manatee County. The matter of decreeing specific performance is one in the discretion of the chancellor and his decision will not be disturbed unless shown to be arbitrary or contrary to law.

The .contract was not signed by the wives of appellees so performance would be subject to their rights in the premises. The chancellor found that the plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law and that on the whole showing made, the case was not a proper one for specific performance. The- evidence has been examined and amply supports this conclusion.

The judgment of the chancellor is accordingly affirmed.

*230 'Terrell, C. 'J., Brown, Buford, Chapman an'd Thomas, J. J., concur. Justice Wi-iitfield not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray Richardson, Inc. v. Carlton, 191 So. 433, 140 Fla. 229, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1093 (Fla. 1939).

191 So. 433 (Ray Richardson, Inc. v. Carlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilbur v. Hightower
778 So. 2d 381 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Biscayne Associates, Inc. v. Carson
104 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)