Ray, N., Pets. v. Penske Logistics
This text of Ray, N., Pets. v. Penske Logistics (Ray, N., Pets. v. Penske Logistics) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
NATALI S. RAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : No. 186 EAL 2022 THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE : OF RIVER RUSSELL, DECEASED AND : JOSEPH B. RUSSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND : Petition for Allowance of Appeal AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE : from the Order of the Superior Court ESTATE OF RIVER RUSSELL, : DECEASED, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : PENSKE LOGISTICS LLC AND PHILLIP : JAMES ANTOINE, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ray, N., Pets. v. Penske Logistics, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-n-pets-v-penske-logistics-pa-2022.