Ray M. Gidney, Comptroller of the Currency v. Commercial State Bank of Roseville, State Bank of Fraser
This text of 278 F.2d 871 (Ray M. Gidney, Comptroller of the Currency v. Commercial State Bank of Roseville, State Bank of Fraser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
108 U.S.App.D.C. 37
Ray M. GIDNEY, Comptroller of the Currency, Appellant
v.
COMMERCIAL STATE BANK OF ROSEVILLE, State Bank of Fraser, Appellees.
No. 15435.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued March 25, 1960.
Decided May 12, 1960, Petition for Rehearing Denied June 3, 1960.
Mr. John G. Laughlin, Jr., Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George, C. Doub, Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Samuel D. Slade, Attorney, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellant.
Mr. N. Barr Miller, Washington, D.C., with whom , messrs. J. Marvin Haynes and Joseph H. Sheppard, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellees.
Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We agree in general with the opinion of Judge Youngdahl in the District Court. Commercial State Bank of Roseville v. Gidney, 174 F.Supp. 770. The appealed judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 F.2d 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-m-gidney-comptroller-of-the-currency-v-commercial-state-bank-of-cadc-1960.