Ray, Lawrence Earl v. Marcus M. Purvis, MD
This text of Ray, Lawrence Earl v. Marcus M. Purvis, MD (Ray, Lawrence Earl v. Marcus M. Purvis, MD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued October 17, 2002
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
NO. 01-02-00292-CV
LAWRENCE EARL RAY, Appellant
V.
MARCUS M. PURVIS, M.D. AND DENISE WOODS, R.N., FNP-C , Appellee
On Appeal from the 21st District Court
Washington County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 32720
O P I N I O N
By an order dated July 15, 2002, we noted the preceding for appellant was advised that, unless within 30 days of the date of the order, he demonstrated, by filing a brief with citations to legal authority, that his notice of appeal was timely filed or that the Court otherwise had jurisdiction to entertain his appeal, this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Appellant has filed a document entitled "Demonstrative Evidence That Appellant's Notice of Appeal Was Timely Filed." Appellant does not demonstrate that his notice of appeal was timely filed, nor that the Court otherwise has jurisdiction to entertain his appeal.
Accordingly, appellant's appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Mirabal, Hedges, and Keyes.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ray, Lawrence Earl v. Marcus M. Purvis, MD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-lawrence-earl-v-marcus-m-purvis-md-texapp-2002.