Ray, L. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty.
This text of Ray, L. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty. (Ray, L. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
LATAY RAY, : No. 56 EM 2022 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HONORABLE JUDGE DENIS P. COHEN : OR PRESIDENT JUDGE, COURT OF : COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA : COUNTY, PA, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2022, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The
Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ray, L. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-l-v-ct-com-pleas-phila-cty-pa-2022.