Ray L. Kagel, Jr. v. Department of the Army

101 F.3d 715, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40644, 1996 WL 673294
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ray L. Kagel, Jr. v. Department of the Army. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 F.3d 1455
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 14, 1996·No. 96-3385·Unpublished

Opinion

101 F.3d 715

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Ray L. KAGEL, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent.

No. 96-3385.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 14, 1996.

REVIEW REINSTATED.

ORDER

The petitioner having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Petitioner's brief is due on or before January 13, 1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray L. Kagel, Jr. v. Department of the Army, 101 F.3d 715, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40644, 1996 WL 673294 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

101 F.3d 715 (Ray L. Kagel, Jr. v. Department of the Army) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.