Ray Joe Bolling v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Ray Joe Bolling v. United States

280 F.2d 430

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 1960

Docket6328

StatusPublished

This text of 280 F.2d 430 (Ray Joe Bolling v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray Joe Bolling v. United States, 280 F.2d 430 (10th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

280 F.2d 430

Ray Joe BOLLING
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 6328.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

February 16, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.

Joseph P. Jenkins, Kansas City, Kan., for appellant.

Paul W. Cress, U. S. Atty., and Jack R. Parr, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Docketed and dismissed on motion of appellee for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

280 F.2d 430

Ray Joe BOLLING
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 6328.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

February 16, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.

Joseph P. Jenkins, Kansas City, Kan., for appellant.

Paul W. Cress, U. S. Atty., and Jack R. Parr, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Docketed and dismissed on motion of appellee for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 F.2d 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-joe-bolling-v-united-states-ca10-1960.