Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Credit Co., in Re Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Debtor

813 F.2d 402, 1985 WL 14172
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 11, 1985
Docket84-2299
StatusUnpublished

This text of 813 F.2d 402 (Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Credit Co., in Re Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Debtor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Credit Co., in Re Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Debtor, 813 F.2d 402, 1985 WL 14172 (4th Cir. 1985).

Opinion

813 F.2d 402
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
RAY DOBBINS LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., Appellant,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY; Ford Motor Credit Co., Appellees.
In re RAY DOBBINS LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., Debtor.

No. 84-2299.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued: June 5, 1985.
Decided: July 11, 1985.

W.D.Va., 604 F.Supp. 203

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (C/A 83-10-M-R)

Before HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and GORDON, Senior United States District Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.

Dennis P. Brumberg (Lutins and Shapiro, on brief), for appellant.

Richard W. Goldman (E. Milton Farley, III; Vincent L. Johnson; Hunton & Williams, on brief), for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. ("Dobbins") appeals from the district court's orders: (1) granting summary judgment for Ford Motor Company ("Ford"); (2) denying Dobbins' motion for relief from the court's summary judgment order; and (3) dismissing Dobbins' conspiracy claim against Ford and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ford Motor Credit Company. Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and oral argument, we conclude that this appeal lacks merit and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., 604 F.Supp. 203 (W.D.Va.1984); id., Misc. 83-M-10-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 16, 1984) (unpublished).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
604 F. Supp. 203 (W.D. Virginia, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
813 F.2d 402, 1985 WL 14172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-dobbins-lincoln-mercury-inc-v-ford-motor-compa-ca4-1985.