Ray Charles Degraffenreid v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner Dr. Crews Dr. Neal Patricia Satterfield, and All Unknown
This text of 841 F.2d 1122 (Ray Charles Degraffenreid v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner Dr. Crews Dr. Neal Patricia Satterfield, and All Unknown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
841 F.2d 1122
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ray Charles DEGRAFFENREID, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William D. LEEKE, Commissioner; Dr. Crews; Dr. Neal;
Patricia Satterfield, and all unknown defendants,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-7414.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 28, 1988.
Decided: February 26, 1988.
Ray Charles Degraffenreid, appellant pro se.
Robert E. Petersen, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Degraffenreid v. Leeke, CA-3:87-794-6 (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
841 F.2d 1122, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2388, 1988 WL 16961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-charles-degraffenreid-v-william-d-leeke-commis-ca4-1988.