Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 20, 2022
Docket02-22-00249-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen (Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00249-CV ___________________________

RAY BUCKLEY, Appellant

V.

RICHARD NGUYEN, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022-000671-1

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On September 22, 2022, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed

as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we would

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with

the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 20, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-buckley-v-richard-nguyen-texapp-2022.