Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 20, 2022·No. 02-22-00249-CV·Published

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00249-CV ___________________________

RAY BUCKLEY, Appellant

V.

RICHARD NGUYEN, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022-000671-1

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On September 22, 2022, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed

as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we would

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with

the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 20, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen (Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.