Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen
This text of Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen (Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00249-CV ___________________________
RAY BUCKLEY, Appellant
V.
RICHARD NGUYEN, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022-000671-1
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On September 22, 2022, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed
as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we would
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with
the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: October 20, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ray Buckley v. Richard Nguyen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-buckley-v-richard-nguyen-texapp-2022.