Ray Bentley v. State
6 P.2d 1117, 39 Ariz. 349, 1931 Ariz. LEXIS 201
This text of 6 P.2d 1117 (Ray Bentley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ray Bentley v. State, 6 P.2d 1117, 39 Ariz. 349, 1931 Ariz. LEXIS 201 (Ark. 1931).
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a conviction of burglary. The record indicates no error, and he has failed to point out any.
This seems to be another of those cases where defendant's attorney has taken the pains to obtain the transcript of the testimony at the county's expense and then lost all interest in its further prosecution.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 P.2d 1117, 39 Ariz. 349, 1931 Ariz. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-bentley-v-state-ariz-1931.