Ray Bentley v. State

6 P.2d 1117, 39 Ariz. 349, 1931 Ariz. LEXIS 201
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided December 31, 1931·No. Criminal No. 756.·Published

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a conviction of burglary. The record indicates no error, and he has failed to point out any.

This seems to be another of those cases where defendant's attorney has taken the pains to obtain the transcript of the testimony at the county's expense and then lost all interest in its further prosecution.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray Bentley v. State, 6 P.2d 1117, 39 Ariz. 349, 1931 Ariz. LEXIS 201 (Ark. 1931).

6 P.2d 1117 (Ray Bentley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.