Ray B. Hutcheson and Sam A. Dryden v. United States of America, No. 71-1226 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409

443 F.2d 73
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 15, 1971·No. 73·Published

Opinion

443 F.2d 73

Ray B. HUTCHESON and Sam A. Dryden, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 71-1226 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431
F.2d 409.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 15, 1971.

Ray B. Hutcheson, pro se.

Sam A. Dryden, pro se.

Ira De Ment, U.S. Atty., David B. Byrne, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Frank M. Johnson, Jr., Chief Judge.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray B. Hutcheson and Sam A. Dryden v. United States of America, No. 71-1226 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, 443 F.2d 73 (5th Cir. 1971).

443 F.2d 73 (Ray B. Hutcheson and Sam A. Dryden v. United States of America, No. 71-1226 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related