Ray Albert Martinez v. State of Utah, Its Duly Elected Judges, and John Turner, Warden of the Utah State Prison

412 F.2d 853, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11498
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided July 15, 1969·No. 110-68_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant in this habeas corpus case here complains of the Utah Statute, U.C.A.1953, 76-38-1, which permits an inference of guilt of larceny when an accused is found in “possession of property recently stolen” when the person in possession fails to make a satisfactory explanation. The charge of the state trial court here adequately met the standards set forth by the Supreme Court in United States v. Romano, 382 U.S. 136, 86 S.Ct. 279, 15 L.Ed.2d 210.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray Albert Martinez v. State of Utah, Its Duly Elected Judges, and John Turner, Warden of the Utah State Prison, 412 F.2d 853, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11498 (10th Cir. 1969).

412 F.2d 853 (Ray Albert Martinez v. State of Utah, Its Duly Elected Judges, and John Turner, Warden of the Utah State Prison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rhymes
480 P.2d 662 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1971)
United States v. Glynn Eldon Fox
435 F.2d 921 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Floyd Edward Turner, Jr.
421 F.2d 252 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)