Rawls v. Wainwright
This text of Rawls v. Wainwright (Rawls v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
William R. Rawls, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-2199 (RJL) ) Simon T. Wainwright, ) ) Respondent. )
vc::l MEM03'DUM (March ,2010)
This matter is before the Court on the United States' opposition to the petition for a writ
of habeas corpus. By Order of January 4, 2010, petitioner was advised to reply by February 12,
2010, or risk summary denial of the petition and dismissal of the case. Petitioner has neither
opposed the arguments set forth in the government's opposition nor sought additional time to do
so. The Court therefore treats the United States' arguments as conceded and dismisses the case
pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b). See Slovinec v. Amer. Univ., 520 F. Supp. 2d 107, 111
(D.D.C. 2007) (discussing enforcement of the local rule) (citations omitted). A separate Order
accompanies this Memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rawls v. Wainwright, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rawls-v-wainwright-dcd-2010.