Rawls v. State

150 S.W. 431, 67 Tex. Crim. 556, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 485
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 26, 1912·No. No. 1960.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

—Appellant was convicted under an information charging her with enticing and decoying a minor from the custody of I. N. Graham, the legally appointed guardian of the minor, whose name was Silas Castle.

What purports to be a statement of facts in the record is signed by the attorneys, but was not approved by the judge. It, therefore, can not be considered. In the absence of a statement of facts we are unable to revise the questions presented, to wit: the want of sufficient evidence and errors of omission and commission in connection with the charge of the court.

With the record in this condition the judgment must be affirmed, and it is accordingly .so ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rawls v. State, 150 S.W. 431, 67 Tex. Crim. 556, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 485 (Tex. 1912).

150 S.W. 431 (Rawls v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lightfoot v. State
95 S.W.2d 436 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
First Nat. Bank of Ft. Worth v. Henwood
183 S.W. 5 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)