Rawls v. State
18 So. 3d 1265, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15615, 2009 WL 3320256
Opinion
Charles E. Rawls raises two points on appeal, only one of which merits discussion. Rawls correctly asserts that the written judgment erroneously reflects that he was convicted of two first-degree felonies rather than two second-degree felonies. The State concedes error. Accordingly, we affirm Rawls’ convictions and sentences for two counts of robbery but remand this case to the trial court for the correction of the scrivener’s error.
Affirmed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rawls v. State, 18 So. 3d 1265, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15615, 2009 WL 3320256 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
18 So. 3d 1265 (Rawls v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gen. Servs. & Mgmt. v. Unemployment Apps.
18 So. 3d 1265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)