Rawls v. Moye
25 S.E. 582, 98 Ga. 564
This text of 25 S.E. 582 (Rawls v. Moye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rawls v. Moye, 25 S.E. 582, 98 Ga. 564 (Ga. 1896).
Opinion
Under tbe facts recited, the assignee took nothing except the tenant’s obligation to pay rent. An express assignment was indispensably necessary to pass the landlord’s lien for supplies, provided- for in the contract. The mere transfer •of “the within rent note” was not an assignment of any lien. See Lathrop & Co. v. Clewis, 63 Ga. 282.
Judgment reversed1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Strickland Bros. v. Stiles
33 S.E. 85 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 582, 98 Ga. 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rawls-v-moye-ga-1896.