Rawls v. Moye
25 S.E. 582, 98 Ga. 564
Opinion
Under tbe facts recited, the assignee took nothing except the tenant’s obligation to pay rent. An express assignment was indispensably necessary to pass the landlord’s lien for supplies, provided- for in the contract. The mere transfer •of “the within rent note” was not an assignment of any lien. See Lathrop & Co. v. Clewis, 63 Ga. 282.
Judgment reversed1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rawls v. Moye, 25 S.E. 582, 98 Ga. 564 (Ga. 1896).
25 S.E. 582 (Rawls v. Moye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland Bros. v. Stiles
33 S.E. 85 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)