Rawls v. Lindsey

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Rawls v. Lindsey

165 So. 723

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 13, 1936

DocketNo. 5249.

StatusPublished

This text of 165 So. 723 (Rawls v. Lindsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rawls v. Lindsey, 165 So. 723 (La. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinions

DREW, Judge.

This suit involves an election contest in which the plaintiff’s suit was dismissed upon an exception to the jurisdiction ra-tione materias.

Plaintiff appealed to this court and the case was fixed for trial for this day, *724 and due notice given attorneys for both appellant and appellee. At the hour fixed for trial, appellant made no appearance, -either in person, by counsel, or by brief. We therefore conclude that the appeal has been abandoned, and it is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DREW, Judge.

This suit involves an election contest in which the plaintiff’s suit was dismissed upon an exception to the jurisdiction ra-tione materias.

Plaintiff appealed to this court and the case was fixed for trial for this day, *724 and due notice given attorneys for both appellant and appellee. At the hour fixed for trial, appellant made no appearance, -either in person, by counsel, or by brief. We therefore conclude that the appeal has been abandoned, and it is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 So. 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rawls-v-lindsey-lactapp-1936.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack