Rawlinson v. State
262 So. 2d 239, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6723
Opinion
The appellant was found guilty by a jury of two counts of robbery. He was adjudicated and sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each count to run concurrently. The proof of guilt is clearly sufficient.
On this appeal, two points are presented. The first challenges the admission of certain evidence. The point is not well taken under the rule stated in Karl v. David Ritter, Sportservice, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 23. The second point is likewise unavailing because of the rule stated in State v. Melendez, Fla.1971, 244 So.2d 137.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rawlinson v. State, 262 So. 2d 239, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6723 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
262 So. 2d 239 (Rawlinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Karl v. David Ritter, Sportservice, Inc.
164 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
State v. Melendez
244 So. 2d 137 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)