Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rawlinson v. State

Rawlinson v. State

262 So. 2d 239, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6723
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 1972
DocketNo. 71-1054
StatusPublished

This text of 262 So. 2d 239 (Rawlinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rawlinson v. State, 262 So. 2d 239, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6723 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of two counts of robbery. He was adjudicated and sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each count to run concurrently. The proof of guilt is clearly sufficient.

On this appeal, two points are presented. The first challenges the admission of certain evidence. The point is not well taken under the rule stated in Karl v. David Ritter, Sportservice, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 23. The second point is likewise unavailing because of the rule stated in State v. Melendez, Fla.1971, 244 So.2d 137.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Karl v. David Ritter, Sportservice, Inc.
164 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
State v. Melendez
244 So. 2d 137 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 So. 2d 239, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rawlinson-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.