Rawlins v. Tucker

3 Iowa 213
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJune 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 3 Iowa 213 (Rawlins v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rawlins v. Tucker, 3 Iowa 213 (iowa 1856).

Opinion

Weight, C. J.

If these instructions were properly before us, we should incline to the opinion, that they were not in all respects, as given, correct. We have too frequently held, however, that we cannot notice instructions that come before us as these do, to depart from the rule, whatever the circumstances. Objections must be made at the time they are given or refused, and the record so show, or-this court will not undertake to pass upon their correctness. It would not do to permit a party to stand by, and allow instructions to be given or refused, without objection, wait until he sees the result of the verdict, and then for the first time except. The reason of the rule is, that the mind of the court, shall at the time, be called to the objectionable matter, and there have an opportunity to correct it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gehl v. Milwaukee Produce Co.
93 N.W. 26 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1903)
Rindskoff Bros. v. Lyman
16 Iowa 260 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1864)
Tatum v. Goforth
9 Iowa 247 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1859)
Farr v. Fuller
8 Iowa 347 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1859)
State v. Moran
7 Iowa 236 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1858)
Hall v. Denise
6 Iowa 534 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1858)
Whitney v. Olmstead
5 Iowa 373 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1857)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Iowa 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rawlins-v-tucker-iowa-1856.