Rawlins v. Dade Lumber Co.

88 So. 919, 81 Fla. 772
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rawlins v. Dade Lumber Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 Fla. 398
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 1, 1921·Published

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

In an action of ejectment the plaintiff company, pursuant to the statute, filed interrogatories to the defendant respecting the nature of her claim to the property, and portions of the answers to such interrogatories were stricken as being immaterial and irrelevant. There was judgment for the plaintiff and defendant took writ of error.

As the portions of the answer that were stricken related to the consideration of the deeds of conveyance under which the defendant claimed title and to’ possession of the premises by the defendant, they should not have been stricken. Since the judgment herein was rendered the.ease of Rawlins v. Dade Lumber Co., 80 Fla. 398, 86 South. Rep. 334, has been decided respecting the rights herein contested.

Reversed.

Browne, C. J., and Tayloe, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rawlins v. Dade Lumber Co., 88 So. 919, 81 Fla. 772 (Fla. 1921).

88 So. 919 (Rawlins v. Dade Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rawlins v. Dade Lumber Co.
86 So. 334 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)