Rawlins v. Clements
71 S.E. 490, 9 Ga. App. 365, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 556
Opinion
1. The evidence supports the verdict. The instructions to the jury on the subject of impeachment of witnesses were not confusing or otherwise erroneous.
2. The alleged newly discovered testimony does not demand a new trial, and this court will not overrule the exercise of discretion by the trial judge in relation thereto. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rawlins v. Clements, 71 S.E. 490, 9 Ga. App. 365, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 556 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
71 S.E. 490 (Rawlins v. Clements) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ware v. State
89 S.E. 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)