Rawlings v. City of Baltimore

Fourth Circuit

Rawlings v. City of Baltimore

479 F. App'x 449

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 1, 2012·No. No. 12-1356·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Rawlings appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rawlings v. Baltimore, No. 1:12-cv-00446-BEL (D.Md. Feb. 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Rawlings appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rawlings v. Baltimore, No. 1:12-cv-00446-BEL (D.Md. Feb. 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rawlings v. City of Baltimore, 479 F. App'x 449 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

479 F. App'x 449 (Rawlings v. City of Baltimore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.