Rawleigh, Moses & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Herbert Martin, Jr., and William Leo McNeil

508 F.2d 1332, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16625
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 1975
Docket74-1486
StatusPublished

This text of 508 F.2d 1332 (Rawleigh, Moses & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Herbert Martin, Jr., and William Leo McNeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rawleigh, Moses & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Herbert Martin, Jr., and William Leo McNeil, 508 F.2d 1332, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16625 (8th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the oral arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the district court is based upon findings that are not clearly erroneous, that no error of law appears and that an opinion by this Court would have no precedential value. For these reasons the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the trial court. Rawleigh, Moses & Co. v. Martin, 376 F.Supp. 107 (E.D. Mo.1974). See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rawleigh, Moses & Co. v. Martin
376 F. Supp. 107 (E.D. Missouri, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
508 F.2d 1332, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rawleigh-moses-co-inc-a-corporation-v-herbert-martin-jr-and-ca8-1975.