Rawleigh, Moses & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Herbert Martin, Jr., and William Leo McNeil

Eighth Circuit

Rawleigh, Moses & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Herbert Martin, Jr., and William Leo McNeil

508 F.2d 1332, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16625

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 13, 1975·No. 74-1486·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the oral arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the district court is based upon findings that are not clearly erroneous, that no error of law appears and that an opinion by this Court would have no precedential value. For these reasons the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the trial court. Rawleigh, Moses & Co. v. Martin, 376 F.Supp. 107 (E.D. Mo.1974). See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the oral arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the district court is based upon findings that are not clearly erroneous, that no error of law appears and that an opinion by this Court would have no precedential value. For these reasons the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the trial court. Rawleigh, Moses & Co. v. Martin, 376 F.Supp. 107 (E.D. Mo.1974). See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.

Rawleigh, Moses & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Herbert Martin, Jr., and William Leo McNeil, 508 F.2d 1332, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16625 (8th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

508 F.2d 1332 (Rawleigh, Moses & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Herbert Martin, Jr., and William Leo McNeil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related