Rawa v. Kroeger

229 A.D.2d 947, 646 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8983

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants established prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury, and plaintiff "failed to sustain [his] burden of making ' "a prima facie showing of serious injury sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact” ’ ” (Eldred v Stoddard, 217 AD2d 952, 952-953; see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). The "certified report” of plaintiffs physician was based upon plaintiff’s subjective complaints and was not sufficient to establish a serious injury (see, Eldred v Stoddard, supra, at 953). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rawa v. Kroeger, 229 A.D.2d 947, 646 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

229 A.D.2d 947 (Rawa v. Kroeger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eldred v. Stoddard
217 A.D.2d 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)