Raw Coal Mining Co. v. Secretary of Labor

553 F. App'x 340
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 4, 2014·No. No. 13-2060·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raw Coal Mining Company seeks review of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission’s (“Commission”) order denying its motion, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1), to reopen the civil penalty assessment proceedings. Our review of the record reveals that Raw Coal failed to urge before the Commission the objection it now makes to this court, and it has not presented extraordinary circumstances excusing that failure. See 30 U.S.C. §§ 816(a)(1), 823(d)(2)(A)(iii) (2012) Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raw Coal Mining Co. v. Secretary of Labor, 553 F. App'x 340 (4th Cir. 2014).

553 F. App'x 340 (Raw Coal Mining Co. v. Secretary of Labor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related