Ravinia Co. v. Strobel

193 Ill. App. 378
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 15, 1915
DocketGen. No. 6,011
StatusPublished

This text of 193 Ill. App. 378 (Ravinia Co. v. Strobel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ravinia Co. v. Strobel, 193 Ill. App. 378 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.

■ 2. Landlord and tenant, § 33*—when description of demised premises in lease sufficient. The description in a lease of the demised premises is sufficient where it can be readily identified and located. 3. Forcible entry and detainer, § 81*—when notice to quit admissible in evidence. A notice to terminate a tenancy under a corporation, held admissible under the pleadings in an action for forcible detainer without preliminary proof that it was signed by the president of the corporation. 4. Forcible entry and detainer, § 79*—when lease and assignment admissible in evidence. A lease and an assignment thereof held properly admitted in evidence in an 'action for forcible detainer. 5. Forcible entry . and detainer, § 91*—when peremptory instruction for plaintiff proper. A peremptory instruction for the plaintiff was properly given in an action for forcible entry and detainer, where there was no evidence tending to show that the defendant was entitled to possession of the premises in question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 Ill. App. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ravinia-co-v-strobel-illappct-1915.