Ravid v. Karo

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ravid v. Karo

121 N.Y.S. 272

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.Y.S. 272 (Ravid v. Karo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ravid v. Karo, 121 N.Y.S. 272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinions

SEAB.URY, J.

This is a simple action for goods sold and delivered. The only serious question presented upon this appeal is whether the defendant sustained his plea of payment. The' defendant offered testimony tending, to establish that he had paid the amount due to one Berman. Who Berman was, or what relation he sustained to the parties, does not appear. Under these circumstances the learned court below properly held that the defendant had not sustained his defense of payment, and awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

BIJUR, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEAB.URY, J.

This is a simple action for goods sold and delivered. The only serious question presented upon this appeal is whether the defendant sustained his plea of payment. The' defendant offered testimony tending, to establish that he had paid the amount due to one Berman. Who Berman was, or what relation he sustained to the parties, does not appear. Under these circumstances the learned court below properly held that the defendant had not sustained his defense of payment, and awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

BIJUR, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 N.Y.S. 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ravid-v-karo-nyappterm-1910.