Raven v. State
This text of 309 S.E.2d 656 (Raven v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of possessing a deadly weapon while in confinement of a penal institution. OCGA § 42-5-63 (Code Ann. § 77-361). Appellant bases his appeal solely on the general grounds.
At trial, the evidence revealed that Captain William B. Flurry, an employee of the Georgia State Prison at Reidsville, was walking the grounds of the prison when he observed appellant doing something with the front of his shirt and pants. Captain Flurry conducted a pat-down search and found a crude knife about 10 inches long on appellant’s person. Appellant claims that he was nowhere near the area where the search allegedly took place.
“The credibility of a witness is a matter to be determined by the jury . . .” OCGA § 24-9-80 (Code Ann. § 38-1805). We believe that there was sufficient evidence from which a rational trier of fact could find appellant guilty as charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 S.E.2d 656, 168 Ga. App. 398, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raven-v-state-gactapp-1983.