Ravello v. City of New York

249 A.D.2d 530, 671 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4620
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 27, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated March 10, 1997, which denied his motion for leave to serve and file an amended summons and complaint naming an additional defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[531] The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that Moran Towing and Transportation Co., Inc., which the plaintiff proposed to add to the complaint as an additional defendant, is not united in interest with the original defendants (see, CPLR 203 [b]; Buran v Coupal, 87 NY2d 173; Desiderio v Rubin, 234 AD2d 581). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ravello v. City of New York, 249 A.D.2d 530, 671 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

249 A.D.2d 530 (Ravello v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simpson v. Four Keys Enterprises
254 A.D.2d 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)