Ravello v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ravello v. City of New York

249 A.D.2d 530, 671 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4620

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 530 (Ravello v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ravello v. City of New York, 249 A.D.2d 530, 671 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated March 10, 1997, which denied his motion for leave to serve and file an amended summons and complaint naming an additional defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[531]*531The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that Moran Towing and Transportation Co., Inc., which the plaintiff proposed to add to the complaint as an additional defendant, is not united in interest with the original defendants (see, CPLR 203 [b]; Buran v Coupal, 87 NY2d 173; Desiderio v Rubin, 234 AD2d 581). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated March 10, 1997, which denied his motion for leave to serve and file an amended summons and complaint naming an additional defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[531]*531The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that Moran Towing and Transportation Co., Inc., which the plaintiff proposed to add to the complaint as an additional defendant, is not united in interest with the original defendants (see, CPLR 203 [b]; Buran v Coupal, 87 NY2d 173; Desiderio v Rubin, 234 AD2d 581). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 530, 671 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ravello-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack