Rauschenberg v. Peeples

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rauschenberg v. Peeples

118 S.E. 409, 30 Ga. App. 384, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 486

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 25, 1923

Docket13913

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 118 S.E. 409 (Rauschenberg v. Peeples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rauschenberg v. Peeples, 118 S.E. 409, 30 Ga. App. 384, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 486 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

Applying the principles announced in the headnotes, there was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the part of the amendment set forth in the statement of the facts. It follows that none of the rulings or charges were erroneous for any of the reasons assigned. The general grounds of the motion are not referred to in the brief, and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

Applying the principles announced in the headnotes, there was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the part of the amendment set forth in the statement of the facts. It follows that none of the rulings or charges were erroneous for any of the reasons assigned. The general grounds of the motion are not referred to in the brief, and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 S.E. 409, 30 Ga. App. 384, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rauschenberg-v-peeples-gactapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack