Rausch v. Monfort
This text of 251 A.D. 868 (Rausch v. Monfort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve a further notice, specifying facts which he must prove in order to sustain Ms cause of action. The practice of incorporating the allegations of the complaint into a notice of examination is not to be approved, particularly where such allegations consist in part at least of conclusions of law and fact. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 868, 297 N.Y.S. 34, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rausch-v-monfort-nyappdiv-1937.