Rausch v. Monfort

251 A.D. 868, 297 N.Y.S. 34, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8021
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 25, 1937·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve a further notice, specifying facts which he must prove in order to sustain Ms cause of action. The practice of incorporating the allegations of the complaint into a notice of examination is not to be approved, particularly where such allegations consist in part at least of conclusions of law and fact. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rausch v. Monfort, 251 A.D. 868, 297 N.Y.S. 34, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

251 A.D. 868 (Rausch v. Monfort) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J.R. v. V.M.
2024 NY Slip Op 50039(U) (New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, 2024)
Hildebrandt v. Stephan
42 Misc. 3d 719 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Lakeville Merrick Corp. v. Town Board
23 A.D.2d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Milbeck Apartments, Inc. v. Corby Associates, Inc.
285 A.D. 83 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)