Raulerson v. State
This text of 589 So. 2d 369 (Raulerson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We affirm appellant’s first issue without comment. The second issue, whether a sentence for committing a first-degree felony punishable by life may be enhanced under Section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), has been decided adversely to appellant in Burdick v. State, 584 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (en banc), petition for review filed, No. 78466 (Fla. Aug. 20, 1991). The third issue, whether the violent-felony provisions of section 775.084 violate the constitutional prohibitions against double jeopardy and ex post facto laws, has been decided adversely in Perkins v. State, 583 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), petition for review filed, No. 78613 (Fla. Sept. 17, 1991).
AFFIRM.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
589 So. 2d 369, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11404, 1991 WL 231759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raulerson-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.