Raulerson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Raulerson v. State

93 So. 2d 399, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3745

DecidedMarch 6, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 2d 399 (Raulerson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raulerson v. State, 93 So. 2d 399, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3745 (Fla. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined and considered the record in this case in the light of briefs filed and have also, pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) of Section 924.32, Florida Statutes, 1941, and F.S.A., reviewed the evidence to determine if the interest of justice requires a new trial, with the result that we find no reversible error is made to appear and the evidence does not reveal that the ends of justice require a new trial to be awarded.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CON-NELL, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., not participating because of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined and considered the record in this case in the light of briefs filed and have also, pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) of Section 924.32, Florida Statutes, 1941, and F.S.A., reviewed the evidence to determine if the interest of justice requires a new trial, with the result that we find no reversible error is made to appear and the evidence does not reveal that the ends of justice require a new trial to be awarded.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CON-NELL, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., not participating because of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 2d 399, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raulerson-v-state-fla-1957.