Raulerson v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Raulerson v. Jones

187 S.E.2d 344, 125 Ga. App. 268, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1289

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 6, 1972

Docket46672

StatusPublished

This text of 187 S.E.2d 344 (Raulerson v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raulerson v. Jones, 187 S.E.2d 344, 125 Ga. App. 268, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1289 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff in dispossessory and distress proceedings appeals from the judgment for the defendant.

This is the second trial and the second appeal of this case. See Raulerson v. Jones, 122 Ga. App. 440 (177 SE2d 181), in which this court directed the trial court to admit into evidence, and consider in its re-evaluation, a purported written agreement between the parties.

Submitted October 5, 1971 Decided January 6, 1972. Harris, Chance & McCracken, Albert M. Pickett, for appellant. Nicholson & Fleming, John Fleming, for appellee.

The record discloses that the trial judge, sitting as fact finder, did consider this writing and all the circumstances surrounding its alleged execution. The parties also stipulated that the transcript of the first trial should be included in the record of this action.

Having read through both transcripts, we believe it is unnecessary to recite a lengthy account of the testimony. The evidence was sufficient to support the findings of the court which is the sole basis of this appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Eberhardt and Clark, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI