Raul Valdez, Jr. v. Carolyn Dominguez-Valdez
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00223-CV
Raul VALDEZ, Jr., Appellant
v.
Carolyn DOMINGUEZ-VALDEZ, Appellee
From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CI18141 Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 7, 2019
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
On June 12, 2019, we struck appellant’s brief because the brief violated Rules 9 and 38 of
the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9, 38. We ordered appellant to file
an amended brief in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure by July 12, 2019, or
the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not file an amended brief
or request an extension of time. Because appellant failed to timely file a brief in this appeal, this
appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raul Valdez, Jr. v. Carolyn Dominguez-Valdez (Raul Valdez, Jr. v. Carolyn Dominguez-Valdez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.