Raul Rosado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 2017·No. 5D16-3113·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RAUL ROSADO, Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-3113 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

________________________________/ Opinion filed March 17, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Greg A. Tynan, Judge.

Raul Rosado, Miami, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Raul Rosado appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse the summary denial of Rosado’s claim that his attorney failed to object to a sleeping juror. See, e.g., Collins v. State, 200 So. 3d 163, 166 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (“Typically, a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object to a sleeping juror should not be summarily denied.”).

On remand, the trial court shall attach records conclusively denying this claim or hold an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the summary denial of Rosado’s other claims.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.

TORPY, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raul Rosado v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Raul Rosado v. State (Raul Rosado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stanley L. Collins v. State
200 So. 3d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)